Compliance Hotline: 1.800.324.5794
Media & News | Jobs | Families | Get Involved | Contact Us
In late 2011 the University of Texas/San Antonio (UTSA), in collaboration with YAP, received one of five “Best Practice in Mentoring” research grant awards from the Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). Data collection from four YAP sites (in Camden NJ, Las Vegas, Lebanon PA, and Toledo OH) was completed in 2015. The final technical report from this quasi-experimental study, which is being directed by UTSA’s Michael Karcher, Ph.D., is expected in late 2016. Using a recurrent institutional design model, Dr. Karcher has preliminarily indicated that participation in YAP appears to be related to large and consistent improvements in youth misconduct, educational engagement, and employment pursuit. Moreover, these changes were found at discharge from YAP and maintained twelve months post-discharge.
In mid-2011 YAP began collaborating with Jeffrey Butts, Ph.D., an expert in positive youth development and the Director of the Research and Evaluation Center at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Work with Dr. Butts and his staff helped YAP to fine-tune its theory of change and logic model, and produce a series of “issue Briefs” in 2014 that addressed various aspects of YAP services and programs. Subsequently, Dr. Butts and John Jay were awarded a grant from the Annie E. Casey Foundation that is enabling them to study YAP programs in Baltimore MD, Orlando FL, and Fort Worth TX. These efforts are being undertaken to improve YAP’s current services and with the hopes of undertaking a randomized control trial in the near future.
Twelve external evaluations conducted by respected organizations have led YAP to consistently being considered a Best Practice Model.
Youth involved in YAP programs compared with other youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have:
Additionally, findings using other measures of success revealed that young person’s served in YAP programs:
Finally, findings revealed that YAP served a high-risk and high service need population. For example, juveniles tracked in the Philadelphia study reported high service needs, low self-esteem, low levels of school and family bonding in comparison to similar programs that were evaluated. In addition, youth in the YAP’s Tampa program were more likely to have had a history of outpatient mental health treatment, a history of running away, a history of family violence and a history of substance abuse in their biological families than comparable programs. Youth in the Tampa program were also less likely to have received school based mental health services or alcohol or substance abuse treatment prior to intake. Finally, in YAP Pennsylvania programs for youth with disabilities over 37% of the youth studied have autism.
Compendium of Studies